Manufacturing
Downtime, quality, throughput. Answered from the shop floor up.
Our engineers have configured Ignition, Siemens and Rockwell on real lines. We connect the control layer, the historian and the ERP so "why was line 3 down yesterday" gets a real answer, not a meeting.
Typical issues PE faces in manufacturing
Not the plant's problems. The four that land on the fund, and that we find in almost every manufacturer we open up.
-
You cannot compare two plants
Each site defines downtime and scrap its own way, so group reporting is a reconciliation exercise and a bolt-on takes a year to land on the same basis as everything else.
-
Capital requests you cannot test
The downtime behind the business case was categorised by whoever installed the SCADA. You are asked to fund a machine while the time is going to changeovers, and nothing in the pack shows it.
-
OT exposure that surfaces at the worst moment
Flat networks and standing vendor access reach you through an insurance renewal, a customer audit, or the next buyer's diligence. Rarely before.
-
An estate that depends on one person
Undocumented, unpriced at entry, and one resignation away from being the fund's problem rather than the plant's.
What it runs on
Six layers, and our engineers have configured systems in all of them on real lines. The names are what a plant actually has, not a wish list.
-
Control and SCADA
- Ignition
- Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Siemens WinCC
- iFIX
-
PLCs and devices
- Allen-Bradley
- Siemens S7
- Beckhoff
-
Historian and analytics
- AVEVA PI System
- Canary
- Power BI
-
ERP and MES
- Microsoft Dynamics 365
- SAP
- Plex
-
OT network and security
- Fortinet
- Cisco
- Claroty
-
Cloud and identity
- Microsoft Azure
- Entra ID
- Microsoft 365
Third-party names are listed so you can see what we work in. They are the property of their respective owners and imply no endorsement.
What we do about it
In the order that matters, which is rarely the order it gets asked for.
-
Separate OT from IT
Segmented network, audited remote access, monitoring that knows what a PLC is and does not restart one to patch it.
-
Turn the historian on properly
Tags reviewed against the licence and collection fixed at the interface, not papered over in a report downstream.
-
Fix the reason codes
Downtime categorised the way the plant actually loses time, so the improvement plan and the capital behind it point somewhere real.
-
Join the floor to the ERP
Production, scrap and downtime moving on their own. The shift report becomes a screen instead of a spreadsheet.
You have an IT manager already. This is not his job.
He keeps the plant running and he is usually good at it. What he has never been given is the time, a second pair of hands, or any reason to have done this before.
-
One deep person is a risk, not a department
Everything that matters is in one head, undocumented, and on holiday in August.
-
He has never done a carve-out
Nor should he have. It is a thing you do twice in a career, and the first one is expensive.
-
OT security is its own specialism
An engineer who can rebuild a domain controller is not thereby an engineer who can segment a live plant network.
-
He cannot audit himself
A finding is worth more from someone with nothing to lose by writing it down.
Value creation
What we do across the hold, and where each one lands in the numbers a buyer checks.
-
Availability out of data you own
The historian is already collecting. Reading it properly moves throughput before any capital is committed.
-
Licence and SaaS rationalisation
A Microsoft licence audit, and the four tools three sites bought separately to do one job.
-
One definition, every site
Availability, scrap and OEE defined once across the group, so a bolt-on reports on day one rather than at the next year end.
-
An estate the next buyer can verify
Documented, segmented, correctly licensed. Your entry findings do not become his.
Neurotic AI Platform, on your plant
The same product every portfolio company gets, carrying the screens a plant opens and nobody else does. Asked in the words used on the floor.
Ask Why was line 3 down yesterday?
Changeover, not breakdown. Most of it on one product switch.
Time lost by line, yesterday
Line 3, by reason
- Product switch, 14:20 longest single stop
The change is not a better monthly report. It is that the question gets asked on the day it matters, by the person who has it, without a request going to anyone. A shift lead can ask why line 3 stopped before the next shift starts, and the answer carries the systems it came out of.
AI intelligent dashboards
We build these quickly, and to your business: dashboards that let you see every line, every shift and every stoppage in one place, and compare plants that have never been comparable — with the alerts and notifications that go with them, so a number that moves finds you rather than waiting to be found.
-
Line performance
Output and availability by line and shift, read from the control layer rather than from a shift report.
-
Downtime analysis
Where the time actually went, by reason, so the improvement plan and the capital behind it point at the same thing.
-
Quality and scrap
Scrap by line, product and cause, so a bad run is a question that day rather than a variance at month end.
-
Maintenance
What is due, what is overdue, and what has failed twice.
-
OT access
Who reached the control network, from where, and whether that access still needs to exist.
These are the five a plant asks for first. The screens are built to the group, not chosen from a menu, so a dashboard you need and cannot find anywhere on this list is the ordinary case rather than a special one.
Where to start
A two week audit. One document. No obligation.
Fixed scope, fixed price. It reads your systems and tells you what is wrong, what each fix costs, and what to do first. You keep the report either way.
What it turns up
- Licences paid for and not used
- Firewall rules nobody has reviewed since install
- Administrator accounts with no owner
- Reports built on a source that stopped updating
- An integration failing quietly, nobody alerted
What it reads live
- Licences, systems and what they cost waiting
- Network, remote access and segmentation waiting
- Cloud tenant, identity and admin rights waiting
- Core systems and how they connect waiting
- Reporting, data quality and access waiting
One document: what is wrong, what it costs to fix, and what to fix first.