Neurotic
Menu Close

News

Subscribe

How we replaced Apollo, Waalaxy and Expandi with our own outreach tool

Our sales team ran LinkedIn outreach through three subscriptions. Cluttered screens, a seat for everyone who looked, and no idea what any of them did with the account. So we built Outreach, and the bill fell to a fraction.

Apollo PER SEAT Waalaxy PER SEAT Expandi PER SEAT Outreach Runs in the lead’s morning. Our data. No seats. LIVE

Our sales team ran LinkedIn outreach through the usual subscriptions. Apollo for the lists. Waalaxy for the sequences. Expandi on trial because the first two disagreed about who we had already contacted.

Each wanted a seat for every person who looked at it. Each put a wall of counters in front of a team that needed four numbers. None would say what it was doing with our one LinkedIn account between those counters. So we built our own, and took the three subscriptions off the bill.

The screens were the problem before the price was

Open any of the three and you get a dashboard built for a sales floor sending thousands of requests: tabs inside tabs, a sidebar of modules the team never opened, settings explained in a help centre rather than on the page. A founder or a team lead who gives a screen three seconds leaves with nothing.

What the subscriptions give a team, and what ours does

Per-seat tools

  • A dashboard of counters, built for volume teams
  • Every term assumed; help lives in a knowledge base
  • Sends in your working hours, wherever the lead is
  • Each tool counts only its own requests
  • Your leads and replies live in their database
  • A seat for every person who looks

Outreach

  • Four numbers and one chart, filtered by period and campaign
  • Every term explains itself on hover
  • Sends in the lead's own morning, worked out from their location
  • Counts every tool's requests against LinkedIn's weekly line
  • Your leads and replies live in yours
  • No seats. The whole team supervises for nothing

We wrote ours the other way round. Every page answers one question. Every term explains itself when you hover over it. Every campaign opens into the same one-screen summary.

Who built it

The engineers who built Outreach have shipped systems for blue-chip companies, where a screen is read by people with no patience and no time for a manual. That discipline is what you see in it: the first screen shows what changed this week, and nothing else until you ask.

What it has that the subscriptions did not

  • A summary of every campaign on one screen: when it runs, where the leads are, the sequence step by step, how far the leads have got, and what it is using of the weekly budget.
  • Sending in the lead's own morning, Monday to Thursday, worked out from where they are. The subscriptions send in your working hours, wherever the lead is.
  • One weekly budget across every tool on the account, with the other tool's requests counted against the same line.
  • A kill switch that pauses the account when acceptance drops or too many requests sit unanswered.
  • Every lead, message and reply in our own database, with a search across everyone and a column per timezone.
  • No seats. The whole team can watch, and adding a colleague adds nothing to the bill.

A campaign summary, as the team lead sees it

Neurotic Outreach Example view
Finance leaders in sequence · replied · still to invite Running
Operating partners in sequence · replied · still to invite Running
Talent and people in sequence · replied · still to invite Paused
RunsMon to Thu, mornings, in each lead’s own time TimezonesNew York · London · Chicago Sequence View → Like → Connect, short note → Message → Message → Message Progress Budget
Every term explains itself on hover, and every campaign opens the same way, so a team lead can check six campaigns in a minute.

Supervising the team's campaigns

This is the part a team lead feels first. Each campaign is a row with a green dot while it runs and an amber one when it is paused. Open it and the summary reads top to bottom in a glance: schedule, timezones, sequence, progress, budget. A dropdown starts or pauses it. Six campaigns take a minute to check, and nobody has to ask the person running them.

What the research changed

We did not copy the vendors. We read the research first: the academic work on familiarity and reciprocity, the large datasets the vendors publish, and LinkedIn's own rules. Three findings changed the design.

What one lead sees, and when

Profile view Day 1 Like a post Day 1 Connect Day 3 Message one Day 4 Message two Day 11 Last message Day 18 Mornings only, in the lead’s own timezone, Monday to Thursday →
The like happens only if the post is recent. The first message waits until they accept; the second and third go only if nobody has replied. A reply stops everything.
  • Timing beats wording. A request that lands in the lead's own morning, Monday to Thursday, is accepted far more often than one sent in the evening.
  • A note does not win acceptance. It wins the reply afterwards. So the request carries a short, honest line or nothing, and the pitch waits until they have said yes.
  • Three messages beat five. After the third, replies fall and complaints rise. The sequence stops there.

The tool did not make the team better at outreach. The reading did. The tool makes sure they do what we read.

The line nobody shows you

Every tool on one LinkedIn account counts against the same weekly line. Cross it and the account is paused for a week. Outreach shows that line on the first screen, counts the other tool's requests against it, and refuses to pass it. Before every request it reads the profile and skips anyone already connected or already invited.

One LinkedIn account, two tools, one weekly line

Waalaxy Outreach headroom LINKEDIN PAUSES THE ACCOUNT Connection requests in a rolling week →
Outreach reads the profile before every request and skips anyone the other tool already reached, so the two never double up.

What it cost

A small monthly fee for the service that holds the LinkedIn session, and nothing per seat. Against three subscriptions priced per person, the bill fell to a fraction of what it was.

Could you have one?

That is the kind of thing we build for operating partners and the companies they run: the small, specific tool that replaces a stack of subscriptions nobody fully uses, with screens their team can read. Tell us which tools you are paying for and we will show you ours.

Where Neurotic comes inAboutSenior engineers only. No graduate bench, no bait and switch.Read more

Questions operating partners ask

Why replace Apollo or Waalaxy instead of just paying for them?

Price was the smaller reason. The bigger ones were control and clarity: every lead, message and limit lives in our own database, and the screens were built for a reader who decides in seconds rather than for a sales floor.

Is automating LinkedIn outreach safe for the account?

Only with discipline. Outreach keeps a weekly ceiling well under the point where LinkedIn pauses an account, counts what other tools send against the same line, spaces every action by minutes, works only in the lead's own morning, and pauses itself when acceptance drops.

Can a team lead see what everyone's campaigns are doing?

Yes. Every campaign has a one-screen summary: when it runs, where its leads are, the sequence step by step, how far the leads have got, and what it is using of the weekly budget. Nobody needs a seat to look.

What did the research say actually improves replies?

Who you contact and when. A morning request in the lead's own timezone is accepted far more often than an evening one, a short honest note earns more replies after acceptance, and three messages do better than five.

← All posts